Watched and lived vicariously through Retro two days ago—and it hit me like an icebucket. But the hate this film has received made me come here and genuinely question the validity of responses to art in our society, especially in Social Media
Retro was a very interesting watch, in more ways than one. Arguably one of the most conversation-worthy films to come out this year in terms of the high concepts it tackled, the wild avenues it walked into, and the ideas it boiled down to. Not many filmmakers—frankly, only one man in the entirety of Tamil cinema right now—attempt to scratch the surface of the themes that Retro dives into. And so, I present to you this through my weird af FAQ. Spoilers (but not too much) ahead
⸻
1. “Bro, the movie was weird.”
It’s a Karthik Subbaraj movie. The man has never stuck to a single genre even if his life depended on it. What were you expecting?
⸻
2. “Nothing felt real. It all felt like a movie.”
It’s literally called Retro (they definitely could’ve found a better title). It was divided into chapters, almost like a hyperlink anthology, with each chapter carrying a distinct mood. There was a full-on “Senorita I Love You” song montage in the middle like an Instagram edit—that lit up the screen like a mercury bulb.
The story and its payoffs were built upon the biggest character arcs from Hindu mythology. It was designed to be dramatic. It was made for the good guy to win. It was unapologetically cinematic. We’ve consumed so much “real world cinema” lately that we forget—cinema is fiction, and it unfolds only on screen.
This was never a problem for GOAT or Good Bad Ugly which took a jab on how their own filmness. Retro just takes itself seriously… and still remains a film.
⸻
3. “So, are you saying it’s a flawless movie?”
Absolutely not.
Like many Tamil films, it was overwritten in parts. Karthik himself falls prey to the high of a reveal or a payoff—which is always a double-edged sword. When it lands, it really lands. But when it doesn’t, it absolutely crashes.
But here’s the thing—each viewer must decide if it worked for them or not. Some random voice on social media shouldn’t be allowed to speak for all. We get so few Tamil films that are made almost like a festival film, that is open to interpretation. Even fewer star vehicles dare to do the same. Let’s not reduce that into an anomaly.
Now, some emotions in the second half didn’t land for me—especially the ones involving the “newfound family.” They just didn’t sync with the character’s arc. The course correction was good, but in the bigger picture, it felt jarring.
Santhosh Narayanan’s music was a polarising case study. Needs a whole separate analysis. But above all, the film got the marketing wrong as a love story. From the first look and tagline—Love. Laughter. War—people assumed the “war” was because of the love. Thin lines
⸻
4. “Dei nee frog dhaane?”
I’ve trolled Suriya more than I’ve appreciated him in the past 15 years. The man’s been the superman of poor script choices. But this isn’t about Suriya. He did his job. And so did everyone else. Pooja Hegde was divine. Joju was splendid as Thanos. That cult leader, though, felt like a clown—and I still can’t figure out what that character was supposed to represent. But here’s the real point—Frogman hasn’t been in a film this good since Singam 2, and hasn’t had this level of theatrical highs since Ayan.
What truly stood out was how Retro had these epic big hero moments baked into the story itself—something Karthik has never done before with a star apart from a once in a Lifetime Petta. That’s a big win.
⸻
5. otha apram ennada prechana
Retro, much like its actual plot actually opens up several larger, out-of-film conversations outside the film
Like it or not, we’re witnessing the slow death of cinema as we know it. Films today are often made for audiences with the attention span of a goldfish, trained by reels and shorts. The 200 rupees we pay for a ticket often give us an experience that ends the moment we reach the bike parking.
Paintings were never corrupted. Theatre was never corrupted. But cinema, a visual artform, got fucked. There are so few films today that encourage interpretation without resorting to either shock content or outright scams (you know which films I am talking aboiut). Retro, like many of Karthik’s earlier ventures, does exactly that—while making a star hero become the movie’s protagonist just 15 minutes in—and earn his hero status only by the end.
But here’s the issue: the volume of interpretations around Retro has been seen as a negative. That’s absurd. Even Santhosh Narayanan probably had a different read of the film than I did—maybe that’s why the score felt off to me (for the first time ever in a Santhosh soundtrack). But just because an artwork allows for multiple meanings doesn’t make it bad.
⸻
We are cursed by this “first half–second half” formula in Indian cinema. Except for writing a banging interval block, it is always a hedache.
And for a character journey like this one, it does more harm than good. When you open brackets in the first half and leave gaps, audiences begin imagining their own version of what’s to come. So when the second half finally arrives, they’re not comparing it with the first half—they’re comparing it with the version in their heads.
⸻
I’ve never been a fan of discussing films on Twitter, now X. It’s actually unlike any other social media. It’s filled with a bunch of morons who call for equality, say every opinion matters and yet hypocritically consider their opinion superior to others. Been a moron, done that and it is now even worse because of the monetisation policies.
X now has the power to make or break a film even before most people have seen it. The collateral damage Retro faces is actually a wake up call for people who make decisions based on a faceless rando on twitter.
⸻
A little word about my man :-
At the end of the day, none of what I say might matter. But I’ll still say this—art should be viewed through your own lens.
Karthik Subbaraj is, without a doubt, the best writer-director in Tamil cinema over the last 15 years. Not by box office numbers—but by originality and redefining what cinema could be. Each of his films has its own Aadhar card. And love it or hate it, that is on you but the whole point of this write up is that, only you are responsible for your opinion.
The biggest villian of Retro and any other Karthik film after this is just his own filmography. Retro may very well be the 6th best film in Karthik’s own list. But that is just the standards my man has set. It is a large ambitious experiment where he stretches the written word to its limits. The moral of the film is, perhaps, the biggest experiment of all—and one that no major filmmaker would even attempt in undertones.
That moral about laughter deserved a whole film. So did the mythology. So did the cult. So did the love. Retro isn’t a wedding-style full meals—it’s more of a walk through a food street. You like some dishes more than others. Some you might not like at all. But your stomach is full, and your mind is full of thought.
And just like Karthik’s ideas—you can’t ignore it.









































